Identifying isolated or fragmentary bones can be difficult in
archaeological and forensic contexts. Numerous non-osseous materials
such as wood, pottery, plastics, or even stones can sometimes be
mistaken for fragmented human bone. Human remains can often become
mixed with those of animals. In addition, identification can be further
complicated by modifying factors such as burning or warping. There are
generally three levels of identification that can be utilized to
distinguish between human and animal bones; gross skeletal anatomy, bone
macrostructure, and bone microstructure (histology).
Skeletal Anatomy
Cranial morphology differs dramatically between humans and
animals due to the uniquely large brains that humans have compared to
body mass. Humans have small faces compared to our large, bulbous
cranial vault and this minimizes facial projection compared to animals.
Human vault musculature is less well developed than in animals, who
often have developed saggital and occipital crests. Since animals (even
large ones) have much smaller brains, their cranial bones are generally
more curved and individually smaller.
The interior surface of animal vault bones usually have more
complex surface morphology than humans, whose interior vault surfaces
are relatively smooth occasionally embedded with grooves from meningeal
vessels. Animal mandibles are often “V” shaped in superior/inferior
view and separate at the midline as opposed to the “U” shaped singular
construction of the human mandible.
Human crania are oriented on a vertical axis and the orbits are
located in the front and above the nasal aperture. Animal crania are
oriented on a horizontal axis and the orbits are located behind and
lateral to the nasal aperture. These orientations also cause the
position of the foramen magnum to be located inferiorly in humans and
posteriorly in animals.
Some basic differences in human and animal cranial anatomy are
defined in Table 1 below, but detailed information on distinguishing
many North American animal species based on their cranial morphology can
be found in
Mammal Osteology by Gilbert
(1990) and
Mammal Remains from Archaeological
Sites by Olsen (1964).
Table 1. Differential Skeletal Anatomy of Humans
and Animals:Cranium |
Human |
Animal |
Large bulbous vault, small face |
Small vault, large face |
Vault relatively smooth |
Pronounced muscle markings, sagittal crest Inferior |
Inferior Foramen Magnum |
Posterior Foramen Magnum |
Chin present |
Chin absent |
Orbits at front, above nasal aperture |
Orbits at sides, posterior to nasal aperture |
Minimal nasal and midface projection |
Significant nasal and midface projection |
"U"-shaped mandible (no midline separation) |
"V"-shaped mandible (separates at midline) | | | | | | |
Dentition varies greatly between humans and animals, and even
between different species of animals. Human teeth reflect a generalized
design, including a mix of slicing (incisors), puncturing (canines), and
grinding (molars) teeth. They are normally more rounded than animal
teeth. Most animal teeth reflect specialized dietary adaptations.
Grazing animals have more grinding teeth with specialized ridges and
carnivores have more shearing teeth with sharp ridges. In addition, many
animals have different dental formulas compared to humans. Dental
formulas are annotated with the number of each tooth type for a quadrant
of the mouth. Adult humans generally have a compliment of 32 teeth,
eight in each quadrant; this includes two incisors, one canine, two
premolars, and three molars (2:1:2:3). Although highly variably, many
placental mammals exhibit a generalized dental formula that includes
three incisors, one canine, four premolars, and three molars (3:1:4:3).
Some basic differences in human and animal dentitions are defined in
Table 2 below, but detailed information on distinguishing species
based on their dentition can be found in
Teeth
by Hillson (1986).
Table 2. Differential Skeletal Anatomy of Humans
and Animals: Dentition |
|
Human |
Animal |
Omnivorous |
Carnivorous; Herbivorous; Omnivorous |
Dental formula 2:1:2:3 |
Basic dental formula 3:1:4:3 |
Incisors (maxillary) are larger than other mammals |
Horse maxillary incisors are larger than human incisors |
Canines small |
Carnivores have large conical canines; Herbivores have small
or missing canines |
Premolars and molars have low, rounded cusps divided by
distinct grooves |
Carnivores have sharp, pointed cheek teeth; Herbivores have
broad, flat cheek teeth with parallel furrows and ridges |
Much of the difference in long bone anatomy between animals and
humans is the result of pattern of locomotion. As quadrupeds (expect
for birds), animals have dual axes of orientation and their functional
anatomy reflects structures of locomotion in all four limbs, lacks
spinal curvature, has a long and narrow pelvis, and is additionally
reflected in the posterior position of the foramen magnum and bony
development of posterior of the cranium due to musculature. Animal
forelimbs are generally more robust and the radius and ulna may be fused
to give more strength and flexibility in weight bearing. The tibia and
fibula are also often fused, sometimes with diminished or completely
lacking a fibula. Humans on the other hand, as bipeds, have a singular,
central vertical axis of orientation that distributes all of the
individual’s weight through a series of bony mechanisms designed to
soften the impact of bipedal locomotion.
As a result, human crania are
centrally placed on the vertical axis, the spinal column has four slight
opposing curves, the pelvis is broad and short, the femora are angled,
the tibae have thicker proximal surfaces for greater weight bearing, the
feet have dual arch structures, and the upper limbs have less
pronounced musculature and a greater range of motion. Although birds
are also bipedal, bird bones are very different in shape from human
bones, but they are additionally very light in weight. Bird long bones
have very thin walls and only minimal trabecular structure in the ends.
Some basic differences in animal and human post-cranial skeletal
anatomy are defined in Table 3 below, but detailed information on
distinguishing many North American animal species based on their
post-cranial morphology can be found in
Mammal
Osteology by Gilbert (1990) and
Mammal
Remains from Archaeological Sites by Olsen (1964).
Table 3. Differential Skeletal Anatomy of Humans
and Animals: Post-cranium |
Human |
Animal |
Upper limbs less robust |
Robust upper limbs |
Radius and unla are separate bones |
Radius and ulna often fused |
Large, flat and broad vertebral bodies with short spinous
processes |
Small vertebrtal bodies with convex/ concave surfaces and
long spinous processes |
Sacrum with 5 fused vertebrae, short and broad |
Sacrum with 3 or 4 fused vertebrae, long and narrow |
Pelvis is broad and short, bowl-shaped |
Pelvis is long and narrow, blade-shaped |
Femur is longest bone in body, linea aspera is singular
feature |
Femur is similar length to other limb bones, linea aspera
double or plateau |
Separate tibia and fibula |
Tibia and fibula are often fused |
Foot is long and narrow, weight borne on heel and toes |
Foot is broad, weight borne mainly on toes |
The most common human bones to be mistaken for animal bones are
the bones of infants. They are sufficiently different from adult and
even older children bones that they can cause considerable confusion.
With unformed or unfused epiphyses, singular bones are separated by
ossification segments and have indistinct edges. Multiple ossification
centers and epiphyses increase the number of bones associated with an
infant and many are not identifiable to a specific bone. Long bone
diaphyses are thin and lack the trabecula of adults. Cranial bones
easily disarticulate and lack the diploe structure and vault bones are
the same thickness and very often confused with turtle or tortoise
carapace. The petrous portion is separate in infants and, being a
particularly dense bone, it often survives burial better than others.
Ribs of young infants look very much like those of a small animal. It
can also be very difficult to tell the difference between a very young
animal and a human infant. Overall, care must be taken when the
material appears that it could possibly be infant bone.
Bone Macrostructure
Animal bones have a greater density relative to size; they are
less porous and are thicker in cross section than the bones of humans.
In humans, humeral and femoral cortical thickness is about ¼ of the
total diameter compared to about ½ of the total diameter in animal
proximal limb bones. Trabecula is largely absent from the interior of
animal leg bone diaphyses, resulting in a very smooth medullary surface
compared to the web of trabecula covering the medullary surface in human
long bones. Human cranial vault bones have thick diploe relative to
cortical (tabular) bone compared to the thin, more compact vault bones
of animals. Some basic differences in animal and human bone
macrostructure are defined in Table 4.
Table 4. Differential Bone Macrostructure of Humans
and Animals |
Human |
Animal |
More porous cortical bone |
Less porous cortical bone |
1/4 thickness of diameter of long bone |
1/2 thickness of diameter of long bone |
Diaphyseal trabecula present |
Diaphyseal trabecula absent |
Thick diploe in cranial vault bones |
More compact cranial vault bones |
Fig. 1. Relative thickness of animal and human
diaphyseal
cortical bone
Bone Micro-structure (Histology)
The microscopic structure of cortical bone is often diagnostic
between humans and animals, although not practical in a field setting.
Osteons in human cortical bone are scattered and evenly spaced whereas
in many animals osteons tend to align in rows (osteon banding) or form
rectanguloid structures (plexiform bone). Although osteon banding or
plexiform bone indicate animal bone, Ubelaker (1999) cautions that
considerable variety exists between species and between bones of the
same animal which therefore makes the identification of scattered osteon
distribution inconclusive.
All the way to your SUCCESS
No comments:
Post a Comment